next up previous contents
Next: Velocity averaging lemmas () Up: Kinetic Formulations and Regularity Previous: Kinetic Formulations and Regularity

Regularizing effect in one-space dimension

We consider the convex conservation law
 equation3895
Starting with two values at the different positions, tex2html_wrap_inline5901 and tex2html_wrap_inline5903, we trace these values by backward characteristics. They impinge on the initial line at tex2html_wrap_inline5905 and tex2html_wrap_inline5907, respectively. Since the characteristics of entropy solutions of convex conservation laws cannot intersect, one finds that the ratio tex2html_wrap_inline5909 remains positive for all time. After rearrangement this yields
displaymath3899
Thus we conclude that the velocity of a(u) satisfies the Oleinik's one-sided Lip condition, tex2html_wrap_inline5913. Thanks to the convexity of A, we obtain the tex2html_wrap_inline5917 bound on u itself,
 equation3901
We recall that tex2html_wrap_inline5917 bound (2.1.2) served as the cornerstone for the Lip' convergence theory outlined in Lecture IV. Here we focus on the issue of it regularity. Granted (2.1.2), it follows that the solution operator associated with convex conservation laws, tex2html_wrap_inline5925, has a nonlinear regularizing effect, mapping
 equation3903
Indeed, for uniformly bounded initial data, tex2html_wrap_inline5927, with compact support of size tex2html_wrap_inline5929, one obtains tex2html_wrap_inline5931 The tex2html_wrap_inline5917 bound (2.1.2) then yields an upper bound on the positive variation, tex2html_wrap_inline5935; since the sum of the positive and negative variations is bounded,
displaymath3907
it follows that their difference is also bounded,
 equation3909

Observe that no regularity is 'gained' in the linear case, where tex2html_wrap_inline5937. Indeed, the compactness asserted in (2.1.3) is a purely nonlinear regularizing phenomenon which reflects the irreversibility of nonlinear conservation laws, due to loss of entropy (information) across shock discontinuities. Here, nonlinearity is quantified in terms of convexity; in the prototype example of the inviscid Burgers' equation,
 equation3911
one finds a time decay, tex2html_wrap_inline5939. Tartar [31] proved this regularizing effect for general nonlinear fluxes -- nonlinear in the sense of tex2html_wrap_inline5941.

The situation with multidimensional equations, however, is less clear. Consider the 'two-dimensional Burgers' equation', analogous to (2.1.5)
 equation3915
Since tex2html_wrap_inline5943 is a steady solution of (2.1.6) for any tex2html_wrap_inline5945, it follows that initial oscillations persist (along tex2html_wrap_inline5947), and hence there is no regularizing effect which guarantee the compactness of the solution operator in this case. More on oscillations and discontinuities can be found in Tartar's review [32].


next up previous contents
Next: Velocity averaging lemmas () Up: Kinetic Formulations and Regularity Previous: Kinetic Formulations and Regularity

Eitan Tadmor
Mon Dec 8 17:34:34 PST 1997