Collective Dynamics and the Emergence of Patterns

MATH 858J, Fall 2026

Course Information

Place MATH 1308 (unless otherwise stated)
Time Tuesdays & Thursdays, 14-15:15pm
InstructorProfessor Eitan Tadmor
Contacttel.: x5-0648   Email:
Office Hours By appointment 4141 CSIC Bldg #406
Gradinghomework assignments (40%); presentation of a final project (60%)
Prerequisite A graduate level one semester course
     

    Course description

    We will survey recent mathematical developments in collective dynamics of interacting agents. A main question of practical interest is how fundamental protocols of interaction — attraction, alignment, and repulsion — facilitate the emergence of high-order patterns in non-equilibrium systems.
    Different models based on such protocols go back to the influential works of Kuramoto, Reynolds, Vicsek and Cucker & Smale. We will discuss their broad range of applications, from synchronization and opinion dynamics to swarming, robotics and the dynamics of transformers in LLM.
    Three levels of descriptions will be considered: microscopic description of agent-based dynamics on graphs, mesoscopic mean-field description, and large-crowd hydrodynamic description. .

    JOURNAL JOURNAL JOURNAL JOURNAL JOURNAL JOURNAL JOURNAL JOURNAL

    Syllabus

    1     Agent-based models:

    1.1  First-order models for aggregation • Consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           Bounded confidence model • Bearing only model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           Clustering • Consensus-based mean-shift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           Transformers and the geometry of emerging clusters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    1.2  Second-order models for alignment • Flocking • Swarming . . . . . . . . . . . .
    1.2.1 Cucker-Smale model • Vicsek model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           Extensions: Motch-Tadmor model • Tendency • p-alignment • PTWA model
    1.2.2 Communication kernels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           Metric vs. topological • Short- vs. long-range tails • Regular vs. singular head
    1.3  3Zone model: Attraction • Repulsion • Alignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           Anticipation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    1.4  Extensions • External forcing • Rayleigh-type friction • Time delay . . . . . . .
    1.5  Synchronization • Kuramoto and related models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    2    Large-time emerging behavior

    2.1  First-order models • Consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    2.2  Second-order models • Flocking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          ℓ-diameter -- coefficient of ergodicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          ℓ2-diameter -- graph connectivity • spectral gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Short-range kernels: propagation of connectivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Homophilious vs. heterophilious dynamics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    3    Large-crowd behavior -- hydrodynamic description

    3.1  Mean-field limit -- First-order aggregation models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    3.2  Mean-field limit -- second-order models • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    4    Large-crowd behavior -- hydrodynamic description

    4.1 The closure of entropic pressure
    4.2 Regularity and critical thresholds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    4.3  Large-time emerging behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           Spectral gap • Energy Flctuations • Entropy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    4.4  Multi-species • Anticipation • External forcing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    4     Multi-scale descriptions

    4.1  Multi-Flocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    4.2  Multi-species. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


    References:

    • N. Bellomo, J. Carrillo, P. Degond & E. Tadmor (eds), ``Active Particles'', Vol 1 (2017), Vol 2 (2019)
      Vol 3 (2022), Vol 4 (2024), Birkhäuser.
    • I. Couzin & N. Franks, Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants,
      Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270 (2003) 139-146.
    • F. Cucker & S. Smale, On the math. of emergence, Japan. J. Math. 2 (2007) 197-227.
    • F. Cucker & S. Smale, Emergent behavior in flocks. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 52 (2007).
    • S.-Y. Ha & E. Tadmor, From particle to kinetic and hydrodynamic descriptions of flocking,
      Kinetic and Related Models 1(3) (2008) 415-435.
    • R. Hegselmann & U. Krause, Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis simulation,
      J. Artificial Soc. and Social Simul. 5(3) (2002).
    • S. Motsch & E. Tadmor, A new model for self-organized dynamics and its flocking behavior,
      JSP 144(5) (2011) 923-947.
    • C. Reynolds, Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model,
      ACM SIGGRAPH 21 (1987) 25-34.
    • R. Shu & E. Tadmor, Flocking hydrodynamics with external potentials, ARMA 238 (2020) 347-381.
    • R. Shu & E. Tadmor, Anticipation breeds alignment, ARMA 240 (2021) 203-241.
    • R. Shvydkoy, Dynamics and Analysis of Alignment Models of Collective Behavior, Springer, 2021
      (lecture notes).
    • R. Shvydkoy & E. Tadmor, Topologically-based fractional diffusion and emergent dynamics with
      short-range interactions, SIMA 52(6) (2020) 5792-5839.
    • E. Tadmor, Swarming: hydrodynamic alignment with pressure, Bulletin AMS 60(3) (2023) 285-325.
    • T. Vicsek, Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen & O. Schochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of
      self-driven particles, PRL 75 (1995) 1226-1229.
    • T. Vicsek & A. Zefeiris, Collective motion, Physics Reprints, 517 (2012) 71-140.

    Eitan Tadmor